Octopus Deploy has been operating at a profit for the best part of a decade, has turned down a $100,000 acquisition bid, and has never made a pitch to investors.
Now, the bootstrapped software startup has secured a mammoth US$172.5 million ($223 million) investment from US venture capital firm Insight Partners.
Octopus Deploy provides software to support software developers. Software teams are constantly working on new code for updates and bug fixes, founder Paul Stovell explains to SmartCompany.
At some point, that code has to be deployed to the systems. Historically, itโs been pasted into a document and deployed manually, step-by-step.
Octopus is designed to automate that process to minimise the risk of errors and allow changes to be deployed more quickly โ reducing down-time from a matter of hours to only two to three minutes.
A software developer himself, Stovell first started tinkering with the code that would become Octopus Deploy back in 2011. It wasnโt long before he was approached with an offer to sell the fledgling, pre-revenue business for $100,000.
At the time, โI thought that was a great dealโ, Stovell says.
And he would have taken it, if it wasnโt for his wife Sonia Stovell โ now chief financial officer โ who reminded him he had always dreamed of heading up a software company, and predicted he would regret a sale.
โHaving turned down that money … we thought weโd better give this a go.โ
Stovell wonโt be drawn on the valuation of the business today. But, Octopus software is now in use in some 25,000 organisations, including the likes of NASA, Disney and Microsoft. And, itโs been profitable and growing since 2012.
Ditching pitching
So far, the startup has been entirely bootstrapped, meaning this is the first external capital it has accepted, and the first significant chunk of equity it has sold.
For the most part, thatโs simply because the team didnโt have any real reason to raise venture funding.
โSoftware is not naturally a capital intensive business,โ Stovell notes.
When startups go down the venture capital route early, theyโre bound to it, he explains.
They raise a lot of money and grow very fast, but theyโre very rarely profitable.
โIf they donโt get that next round of funding there is no opportunity to stay in business.โ
From 2012 onwards, Octopus was bringing in enough money to replace both the Stovell couple’s wages.
And, up until last year Stovell has been turning interested VCs away. Even now, heโs never put a pitch deck together.
It was Insight Partners that approached him.
The investor had heard of Octopus through several of its existing portfolio companies, which were clients of the Aussie startup.
Insight made โa really compelling pitchโ, Stovell says.
The businessโ largest segment is enterprise customers. And, while the business doesnโt need the capital, bringing on an investor who knows this segment and can help fuel more sales and marketing within it started to look like a good idea.
The funding will be used to continue Octopusโ growth strategy, particularly in the North American region, which already accounts for more than 50% of its customer base.
Octopus Deploy, the North Star
This is far from the typical startup story. But Stovell says heโs never had that โtypicalโ startup founder mindset either.
Part of the reason the business has flown under the radar so far is that it’s made up of very technically-minded people, without much marketing nous.
But, itโs also indicative of where Stovell’s priorities lie.
โBecause we werenโt focused on pitching to anyone else, our permission to stay in business came from customers only.โ
Thatโs led the team to be โintently focusedโ on how to improve the customer experience and make the product as valuable as possible.
โThatโs probably a really good North Star for all companies to follow.โ
Thereโs a lot more buzz around venture-backed businesses, Stovell notes, and it can feel that thatโs the default best way to go for tech startups.
He suggests it should be the other way around. If a business is bootstrapped and profitable, it has longevity, he notes.
Itโs about weighing up whether you want to build a $10 million business over time, or whether you want to shoot for a $1 billion valuation with a lower chance of success.
If Stovellโs own experience is anything to go by, it appears the two may not be mutually exclusive.
Comments