“Unworkable”: Business groups slam Labor’s workplace reforms

Business groups have directed a barrage of criticism at the Albanese government’s proposed workplace reforms aimed at protecting the pay and conditions of workers.

The changes to workplace law, introduced to parliament on Monday, have been labelled as “radical” and “unworkable” by bodies representing employers.

The government says the reforms are focused on closing loopholes, including the use of labour hire workers to undercut the rate of pay agreed for employees.

The reforms also seek to criminalise wage theft, bolster protections for gig workers and create a pathway for casuals to become permanent.

Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke says the changes will apply to a fairly small cohort of firms doing the wrong thing, with the majority of workers and businesses unaffected.

But business groups, which have been campaigning against the changes for several months, are wary of the scope of the reform.

Master Builders Australia, which represents the building and construction industry, challenged the notion the reforms would have a minimal impact.

“There is nothing simple about adding hundreds of pages to the Fair Work Act and expecting businesses of all sizes and independent contractors to try and navigate it,” chief executive officer Denita Wawn said.

The Australian Retailers Association raised concerns about the changes for casual workers.

“We see the benefits of a more permanent retail workforce, but our members say there are currently very low levels of casual conversion,” ARA CEO Paul Zahra said.

He was worried the bill would add administrative hassle without making any material change to casual conversion rates.

Burke challenged anyone opposing the changes to defend the loopholes directly.

“If someone thinks it’s reasonable, that wage theft should not be a crime, defend it,” he said while introducing the new laws to parliament on Monday.

“If someone thinks it’s okay, that someone who could easily be converted to secure work shouldn’t have the option to do so, then say so.”

This article was first published by AAP.