Create a free account, or log in

Ethical dilemma: GP booking startup HealthEngine found to be sharing user data with law firms

๏ปฟAfter recently been found to be sanitising user reviews of Australian GPs, doctor booking startup HealthEngine is in hot water once again, this time over allegedly passing on user information to law firms seeking clients for personal injury claims. According to the ABC,ย documents from massive law firm Slater and Gordon allegedly reveal HealthEngine was passing […]
Dominic Powell
Dominic Powell
Healthengine
HealthEngine co-founder and chief executive Dr. Marcus Tan

๏ปฟAfter recently been found to be sanitising user reviews of Australian GPs, doctor booking startup HealthEngine is in hot water once again, this time over allegedly passing on user information to law firms seeking clients for personal injury claims.

According to the ABC,ย documents from massive law firm Slater and Gordon allegedly reveal HealthEngine was passing on lists of prospective clients daily as part of a “referral partnership pilot”.

As part of the HealthEngine online booking service, customers are required to fill in an array of personal details and details about their injury or condition, including if the injury was sustained in the workplace.

The ABC alleges the documents show that details from around 200 potential clients were passed on to Slater and Gordon by HealthEngine, and out of those, 40 became clients of the law firm, garnering an estimated $500,000 in legal fees for the company.

However, when registering for an appointment through HealthEngine, customers are notified that in doing so, they agree to a series of terms and conditions and HealthEngineโ€™s โ€œCollection Noticeโ€. This notice tells users the service โ€œmay disclose your personal information, for secondary purposes, to third party service providers who support our business activitiesโ€.

These service providers include private health insurance comparison services, credit providers for cosmetic or dental solutions, and legal firms. Users are not provided with the option of โ€˜opting outโ€™ from providing their data, however, with the company stating it โ€œmay be unable to provide you with our online booking servicesโ€ if customers do not provide their personal information.

This is the latest bout of controversy for the Perth-based startup, which was found to be sanitising user reviews earlier this month. As part of a Fairfax investigation, more than 50% of โ€˜positiveโ€™ reviews on the HealthEngine website were allegedly found to be modified to be more positive.

At the time, HealthEngine founder and chief executive Marcus Tan apologised but defended the system as beneficial for both patients and doctors.

HealthEngine raised a $26.7 million Series C funding round in April last year and is backed by numerous high-profile investors, including Sequoia India and the founders of Lux Group.

Transparency and trust essential

Speaking to SmartCompany, sales expert and founder of Barrett, Sue Barrett, believes HealthEngine should have been more transparent about what customers were signing up to.

Rather than just stating the types of services the data would be shared with, she believes the business should have โ€œexplicitly statedโ€ what providers the information was going to be given to. She also takes issue with the use of what she calls โ€œwoollyโ€ language, arguing that businesses should firmly state one way or other if customer data will be shared, rather than just say it โ€œmayโ€ be.

โ€œAs a consumer, I want it made clear to me that I will get calls from these specific businesses, so then Iโ€™m fully aware and not surprised or shocked when it happens,โ€ she says.

Barrett also criticised the practice of some businesses of not giving users the ability to ‘opt out’. She says customers should own their own data, and not have it brokered โ€œunwittinglyโ€.

However, when it comes to the action of prospecting clients, Barrett says thereโ€™s nothing wrong with businesses doing so, as long as theyโ€™re going about it in an ethical fashion.

โ€œThereโ€™s nothing wrong with prospecting, I have no issue with that. Itโ€™s more about the intention behind it,โ€ she says.

โ€œIn the healthcare and childcare sector, thereโ€™s a real moral dilemma about how people are using this sort of data, and how it can potentially be used to prey on people who are vulnerable.โ€

For businesses, Barrett is resolute: be careful about the way you use customer data if you want to be considered a trustworthy business.

โ€œTrust is the heartbeat of business. If a business wants to be considered an honourable company to do business with, they canโ€™t use these sort of strategies,โ€ she says.

In a statement, a Slater and Gordon spokesperson said the firm is โ€œcommitted to creating mechanisms for Australians to access justiceโ€, and is confident the marketing is in line with legal ethical standards.

โ€œSlater and Gordon has acted and continues to act in accordance with all its legal and ethical obligations regarding its marketing activities,โ€ the spokesperson said.

โ€œOur board and management uphold the highest ethical standards in meeting the firmโ€™s legal obligations.โ€

SmartCompany contacted HealthEngine but did not receive a response prior to publication. However, in a statement on the companyโ€™s website, co-founder Marcus Tan said: โ€œHealthEngine does not provide any personal information to third parties without the express consent of the affected user or in those circumstances described in our privacy policyโ€.

NOW READ:ย Fake competitor reviews causing โ€œstress and troubleโ€ for over one third of Australian business