In Part 2 of his Web Secrets, CRAIG REARDON tells you 7 things web designers don’t want you to know.
By Craig Reardon
Like web developers who won’t tell you what you need to know when you build or re-build a site (7 secrets the web industry doesn’t want you to know), some creative people can also live in a different world to us.
Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing better than arriving at a website that is elegant, clean and conducive to browsing. I’ve worked with many professional designers who are a pleasure to do business with, and they are worth their weight in gold.
But some designers can be so far off the mark that what you are left with is a very nice looking piece of art that beyond the surface has nothing to do what a good website should – service your customers.
Here’s some of the things a web creative may not tell you about working with them. And before they get indignant about questioning their good reputations, let me tell you that each of these depictions are based on real life situations (in other words, I’m just the messenger).
Websites can be very deceptive. While they can look a million dollars, the appearance of the website is only a small part of the formula for a successful online presence.
Sure it looks great, but can search engines find it? Is it easy to navigate? Is it well written? Does it provide clear calls to action? Does it provide seamless progression to the sale (or at least inquiry)? Does it allow clients to easily make their own changes? Does its underlying technology allow you to easily and affordably add functionality as your requirements grow? Does it actually work?
I’ve seen hundreds of websites that look fantastic, only to delve further and find many of these issues are not considered. At the end of the day they can mean significant lost business.
There’s no doubt that providing tools for clients to manage their own content can be fraught with danger. I’ve spent considerable time and effort applying best practice layout to a client website only to return a few weeks later to find it’s been butchered by a well-meaning member of the client’s staff.
However, many changes to a website are minor in nature that a client can quite happily make themselves without affecting the visual appeal of the site.
While the notion of a client altering their works of art would send a shiver up the spine of many creatives, in most cases a good balance can be found between keeping the site dynamic and keeping it looking good – saving the client a small fortune in paying the designer to achieve the same result.
I’m of the belief that all creative work should be managed via a central person – usually the person who has designed your corporate ID or brochure. This approach means that your all important branding is carried through the various media with consistency and professionalism.
But sometimes that person has no experience in designing for the web. The result is that you may be paying for the designer’s expensive learning curve or hit a significant stumbling block when you want to add functionality that is beyond their expertise.
This can easily be resolved by having that designer work with your web team, giving you the best of both worlds.
One of our team was recently contacted by a client who had just paid for a brand spanking new website, but wasn’t being listed on Google’s search engine results pages.
A quick perusal of her website quickly identified the problem. Not only was the site built entirely in Flash technology (which means that Google et al couldn’t read its all important html code) but that she had no CMS to allow her to make changes that would address that very issue.
It was with some anger that the client realised that she had just spent several thousand dollars on a good looking lemon.
Don’t be fooled. Funky splash pages (the clever animated pages that slowly unravel before you actually get to the page you are after) are a waste of user’s time and are only there to line the designer’s pockets – even with a “skip intro” button.
Sadly, this is more pervasive than you might imagine. Industry awards inflate egos and look good on resumes. They might even earn some kudos with proud clients.
While the opinions of creative industry judges might be interesting, they distract from the good website’s true purpose – to grow your business.
Don’t get me wrong, Awards can be a good measure of a professional’s creativity, but I’d much rather boast that we’d increased a client’s sales inquiries by a factor of 100 (which we did recently J) than get a pat on the back from some creative guru.
One minute you’re a designer’s best mate, the next you’re being avoided. Some designers have no idea how to manage excessive workloads and might even be unwilling to get help to manage “their babies”. In the meantime your promotion campaign is being held up because you have no website to promote (that is, you’re losing money).
It’s relatively easy to make a website look good without it actually helping drive new business. The best advice I can give to anyone looking at working with a designer is to actually use the websites they provide as reference rather than just look at them.
In other words, set yourself a goal for the website in question and see how easy it is to attain it. So for a fashion store it might be “browse products and purchase a chosen garment online” or for an architect, “view folio, check environmental credentials and request an appointment”.
The less these goals can be achieved, the less you should work with that designer – at least in isolation.
It’s important too to ask the designer whether they have the capability of adding new functionality when you will eventually require it, and to show you an example of how they have grown a website and the costs involved.
Craig Reardon is an eBusiness educator and founder and director of independent web services firm The E Team.
>> 7 secrets the web industry doesn’t want you to know
Smart Company is the leading online publication in Australia for free news, information and resources catering to Australia’s entrepreneurs, small and medium business owners and business managers.
Comments