Most of us were shocked by the results of the federal election. Polling was the fall guy, blamed for misleading us. Yet every day, in every business, decisions are being based on polls. Except in bizspeak, itโs called ‘customer research’.
I almost didnโt bother with this piece, because I feel all Iโve been writing lately relates to how customer research can lead us wrong.
First, it was Shoes of Preyย where โ[what customers] were consciously telling us and what they subconsciously wanted โฆ were effectively polar oppositesโ.
Then, it was Warby Parker,ย realising โwhile customers certainly love the fact that we give back, at the end of the day, itโs not a critical factor in deciding whether to buy a pair of glassesโ.
Way back in 2014 I pointed to the chasm between what news people say theyโll read (national, local and political issues) compared to what they actually read (celebrity and human interest).
As US journalist Derek Thomson put it:ย โAsk audiences what they want, and theyโll tell you vegetables. Watch them quietly, and theyโll mostly eat candy.โ
Plainly, if you are relying on listening to your customers to tell you what you should do, you are delusional. Worse than that, you are irresponsible. You are wasting the time, money and efforts of everyone in your business.
So why fall for it?
Because itโs compelling. From their lips to your ears, how can you refute the words of your precious, earnest customer?
Plus, itโs very difficult to get in trouble if you can point to what the survey said. โNobody ever got fired for buying IBMโ, so the saying goes. Well, nobody ever gets fired for listening to customers, either.
What to do about it? Read any and all of the pieces above. There is a better way and itโs available to you right now. That is, of course, if you are ready for answers rather than responses.
NOW READ:ย Why did Shoes of Prey fail? Because it listened to customers
NOW READ:ย Why Warby Parkerโs โbuy a pair, give a pairโ initiative doesnโt sway customers
Comments